Is Your RCM Study Good Enough to Implement?
An independent quality review of your RCM analysis against the SAE JA1011 and JA1012 standards — delivered by a founding member of the IRCC.
Compliance Index Score
Example scores from a real review (anonymised)
Most RCM Analyses Have Gaps. Here's Why That's Costly.
Incorrect task selection
Choosing time-based tasks where condition monitoring is warranted — or vice versa — wastes maintenance budget and leaves failure modes unmanaged. This is the most common gap found in independent reviews.
Poor function and failure mode definition
Vague function statements and poorly scoped failure modes undermine every downstream decision in the analysis. A quality review checks these foundations before you build on them.
Non-compliant with JA1011 / JA1012
Many analyses called 'RCM' do not satisfy the SAE standard criteria. If your study is ever audited — by a regulator, client, or insurer — non-compliance is a serious liability.
What Is the RCM Quality Check?
You send us your RCM study
Share your worksheets, operating context, and any supporting documents. We accept Excel, PDF, or Word formats.
We review against the Rulebook (v2.8)
Our structured 8-dimension Rulebook checks every aspect of your analysis — from function definition to task selection logic — against SAE JA1011 and JA1012.
You receive your Quality Evaluation Report
A branded, detailed report with a Compliance Index score, rule-by-rule findings, and constructive, actionable recommendations.
Implement with confidence
Use the report as evidence for clients, management, regulators, or IRCC certification. Resubmit for a complimentary re-check if needed.
RCM Quality Evaluation Report
Asset: Centrifugal Pump System (example)
Reviewer: C. James | IRCC Member
Compliance Index: 78/100
Date: May 2026
Choose Your Review Package
All packages include a branded Quality Evaluation Report with Compliance Index score.
Spot Check
Quick sanity check on a small scope
- Up to 2 assets / 50 failure modes
- Compliance Index score
- Summary findings (2–3 pages)
- Email Q&A follow-up
Standard Review
Full review of a single asset study
- 1 asset, up to 60 failure modes
- Compliance Index score (all 8 dimensions)
- 10-page Quality Evaluation Report
- Rule-by-rule findings with recommendations
- Complimentary re-check on resubmission
Retainer
Ongoing QA for consulting firms
- 2 reviews per month
- Priority turnaround
- Email Q&A support
- Monthly summary report
- Discounted ad-hoc reviews
Not sure which package is right for you? Contact us and we'll recommend the best fit for your study scope.
The Most Credible RCM Quality Review Available
C. James
Founder, Reliability Management | IRCC Founding Member & Examiner
“I developed the Rulebook methodology after 30 years of seeing the same gaps appear in RCM analyses worldwide. This quality check gives practitioners and asset owners the independent assurance they deserve.”
Trusted Across Asset-Intensive Industries
Common Questions
Ready to Know Your Study Is Right?
Get an independent quality review from the most experienced RCM practitioner in the field.
Typical turnaround: 10 business days. All submissions are confidential.